Can AI Medical Diagnosis Be Trusted?
I recently tried a service at the hospital where AI analyzed a lung CT to detect nodules, and the results were quite accurate. The doctor also said it's fine as an辅助 tool, but mentioned that full adoption is still difficult due to legal liability issues. Do you trust AI diagnoses? Or do you think it's better for a doctor to review them directly?
9 answers
I've had a similar experience. When doctors double-check the lesions found by AI, it definitely reduces missed cases. However, the unclear legal responsibility is an issue. For trust to be established, it needs to be clear who is accountable when AI makes a mistake.
I believe that direct examination by a doctor should be the standard. AI is nothing more than a supplementary tool. Especially from the patient's perspective, the reassurance of being diagnosed by a human is important. While I welcome technological advancements, complete reliance on them is risky.
Actually, wouldn't AI be more objective? Doctors can make mistakes when they're tired, but AI can analyze consistently. Instead, it might work well if doctors make the final judgment when AI detects anomalies.
Personally, even after seeing AI diagnostic results, I still find myself asking my doctor again. It's not really a trust issue—it's just that the idea of a machine judging my health still feels unfamiliar. Will I get used to it over time?
Legal liability issues will ultimately be resolved by insurance and regulations. Autonomous vehicles were also highly controversial at first, but they're gradually being accepted now. I think AI diagnostics will go through a similar process.
According to medical professors, AI outperforms humans in recognizing certain patterns. For instance, early-stage lung cancer is easy to miss, but AI can detect it well. However, they emphasized that AI cannot replace clinical experience.
Rather than relying solely on AI diagnostic results, wouldn't collaboration between doctors and AI be the most ideal approach? For example, AI could handle the initial screening, and then doctors could make the final judgment. This way, we could improve efficiency while ensuring safety.
I am fully in favor of AI diagnosis! A few years ago, I had a CT scan at a local hospital, and the doctor missed a nodule that was later found during a re-examination in Seoul. If AI could routinely check everything, such unfortunate incidents would decrease.
I have a question. Is the AI diagnostic result disclosed directly to the patient, or is it only for the doctor's reference? I'm concerned that patients might feel anxious if they see the AI results. I think that aspect should also be taken into consideration.